Abdelrazik returns to Montreal
By David Koch
Canadian citizen Abousfian Abdelrazik returned home to Canada on Saturday. Over the past six years, he was repeatedly arrested by the Sudanese, who allegedly tortured him with the complicity of Canada. He was also labelled a terrorist by the United States and the UN Security Council.
A crowd of about 80 supporters and journalists met Abdelrazik at about 1 AM on Saturday night as he arrived in Montreal
Many carried signs reading "Welcome Home".
The exhausted 47-year old man grinned as he stood alongside his step-sister and his son.
He spoke briefly to the jubilant crowd, saying that he was "very happy" to see his family and his city.
The Canadian government prevented Abdelrazik from travelling back to Canada beacuse his name appeared on a United Nations terrorist blacklist, based on supposed links to the Al Qaida.
Adbelrazik's lawyers say that his name appeared on the list after Sudanese officials tortured him.
His lawyers have also obtained official Canadian documents suggesting that he was tortured with the complicity of the Canadian Security intelligence Service, or CSIS.
His name remains on the blacklist, which means that his assets are frozen. This also makes it a federal offense for anyone to provide him with financial assitance.
But Canadian police and intelligence officials have stated that there is no evidence against Adbelrazik.
Sudanese officials have also declared him innocent.
In early June a federal court ordered the government to allow Abdelrazik passage to Canada.
The court said that the government had breached his constitutional right to mobility by refusing to grant him the travel documents needed to board a plane to Canada.
Speaking to reporters on Saturday night, Abdelrazik's lawyer Yavar Hameed said that the work of grassroots human rights activists was:
"an integral part of this victory, both in the court decision, a pivotal moment in terms of buying a ticket, in terms of creating a solidarity fund, in terms of just letting the politicians and the judiciary know that there was a lot of public support behind this case."